Director of Mac and mobile research. Especially when it's up against click fraud code this clever. Sing it loud: The App Store's not perfect. How 18 Malware Apps Snuck Into Apple's App Store.
Site:Wired.Com Virus Cleaner Software Out ThereIn 2000, he wrote the Wired cover story "Why the Future Doesn't Need Us," a Cassandra cry about the perils of 21st-century technology and a striking display of ambivalence from a premier technologist. In the early 1990s, he kept his job but bolted Silicon Valley, "leaving the urgent behind to get to the important," he says. Beginning in 1976, he spent zillions of hours in front of a keyboard, coding the now-ubiquitous Berkeley strain of the Unix operating system then he godfathered Sun's Java programming language and helped design servers that were the Internet's heaviest artillery. On the plus side, there's still some good software out there.There are geeks and then there's Bill Joy - 49-year-old software god, hero programmer, cofounder of Sun Microsystems and, until he quit in September, its chief scientist.We're still there in spirit. I mean, left at the company. One of the best methods for Windows machine is to. Apple has clear instructions on how to do this in its support center. Tracy Connor, who covered the story for the Daily Beast, is that publication’s executive editor.If you are using a Mac, you can wipe your computer by reinstalling Mac OS X.The ideal project is one where people don't have meetings, they have lunch. Great, world-changing things - Java, for instance - always start small. I've always said that all successful systems were small systems initially. You start to get in the way.No doubt, but you were pretty loosely tethered at the best of times. Sometimes, founders leaving is a good thing. I just got a new Mac with two 2-gigahertz processors, 8 gigabytes of memory, and a half a terabyte of internal disk.Good for Apple. Now a personal computer is 2 gigahertz, and yet the software isn't 25 times better. Thirty years ago a supercomputer was 80 megahertz. If you give me machines that are a thousand times as powerful as today's at the same price, I ought to be able to do something radically better. That's a factor of 100 in performance, which means that with some work to make the algorithms run faster, we've got maybe a factor of a thousand improvement still to come. Moore's law still has at least a decade to go with conventional silicon. Rather than writing distributed applications, you write a program - the whole system is an application program. So there's enormous opportunity.Is that something that you'd want to take on? Jini networking technology was a partial attempt. On the other hand, existing operating systems, especially the ones provided by the reigning monopolist here, are deeply flawed. People's expectations in three dimensions are so high. But that's not a space I'm going to go into, by the way. Add 64-bit computing and I can do breathtaking visualization. My goal is to do great things. I just want a system that works.And that beats Windows. I don't need to see the source code. What we need now are great things. Now, there's nothing wrong with letting other people help, but open source doesn't assist the initial creative act. Look at Ken Thompson creating Unix, Stephen Wolfram writing Mathematica in a summer, James Gosling in his office making Java. Are you more or less worried than when you wrote "Why the Future Doesn't Need Us"? My biggest worry then was that people weren't paying attention. And hope is a lousy defense.At last, a warning about impending technological disaster. I sure hope that doesn't happen, but it's not exactly hard to imagine someone doing it. We're just lucky that no one has sent around a virus that erases people's disk drives. They took systems designed for isolated desktop systems and put them on the Net without thinking about evildoers, as our president would say.Still, a lot of people have lost a lot of money over the years shorting Microsoft. I find Windows of absolutely no technical interest. Hauppauge wintv v8 serial kygenEven SARS was just a TV story about a bunch of people wearing masks.But the future really does need us, right? Someone has to write the software. And we still don't get it about epidemics. These technologies won't stop themselves, so we need to do whatever we can to give the good guys a head start. We can't go out and rid the world of evil, as our president seems to think. Very few of them were well-considered. It was a part of me giving back.Did the criticisms of it affect you? Not really. I benefited a lot from earlier generations' sacrifice in setting up the system so I could be as creative as I wanted to. Such is the fate of the engineer: hoist by my own device.You've talked about that story as "public penance." For what? Success. I just wish people reading it on the Web could tell more easily when it's me speaking and when I'm quoting someone else - the Unabomber, for instance. But I stand by everything I wrote. Are people paying enough attention to stop it? I don't think so.There must be something to be cheerful about. Do we care whether we get a police state without civil liberties because the government's "protecting us" from terrorists? I think we do care. The most interesting criticisms focused on what needs to be done.Are you any more at peace with what you see coming? Not when the forces at play are so powerful that we have such strongly negative possible outcomes. You don't get two shots at something like this, so I'm holding off.Meanwhile the markets continue to pour money into the fields that worry you - genomics, nanotechnology, and robotics. The second was prescriptive, and the problem is, I'm not satisfied with the prescriptions that I have. The first was a wake-up call - that's obviously not the book we need anymore. When Moore's law ceases to be true, maybe around 2014 - that would be a good time to retire.Whatever happened to the book you were writing to follow up the article? I've written two manuscripts. Centralized strategies - things like Admiral Poindexter's Total Information Awareness program - don't work. Aren't you calling for something similar with respect to technology? I'm not saying the government should do it. The liability is going to get transferred to the next generation, like everything else.But you've said aspects of the war on terrorism infringe on civil liberties. As long as the Bush administration is in power, nothing's going to get done about any of this. Assuming any of us are still around to have the discussion.A cynic would say that your Wired story made noise but the result was you in an Audi ad with "Jini" and "Java" painted on your face. But I'm afraid we're not going to have this discussion until there's a really big accident, and maybe not even then. What are we in such a hurry for?Easy for you to say. One consequential accident and we'll want to throw those researchers in jail.So much for progress. We have scientists saying they want to publish pathogen gene sequences on the Net. The Pugwash organization's work on sensible nuclear policy is a strong example.But what will get the scientific community to accept being told what to do? Catastrophe. And I think an essential part of getting control of technology will be for international organizations to take a lead in promoting ethical scientific behavior. Half programming language, half operating system, Java has lived up to its billing - breathing life into Web browsers, bridging incompatibility gaps, and, lately, giving us videogames on our cell phones. Kevin KelleherIntroduced by Bill Joy and a team of Sun engineers in 1995, Java was hailed for its ability to run software applications on any platform.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorMike ArchivesCategories |